Poster Presentations
Session Title: LIVER TUMORS b) CLINICAL (EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT) Presentation Date: Apr 25, 2009 EFFICACY, SAFETY AND IMPACT ON QUALITY OF LIFE OF SORAFENIB IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PHASE II STUDY
G. Mantovani1, E. Massa1, C. Spiga1, L. Chessa2, C. Madeddu1, T. Zolfino3, S. Lepori1, G. Serra2, M.R. Piras3, S. Marini4
1Department of Medical Oncology, 2Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cagliari, 3Department of Gastroenterology, Ospedale San Michele, 4Department of Radiodiagnostic, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Introduction: Sorafenib is the only systemic therapy that has prolonged the median survival and time to progression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: The primary aim of this open prospective non-randomized phase II study was to assess efficacy and safety of sorafenib in a selected population of elderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not previously treated. Secondary aims included quality of life (QoL) assessment using SF-36 questionnaire and changes of serum IL-6. All patients underwent multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA) and accordingly were assigned to 3 different categories: fit, intermediate and frail. Scheduled sorafenib dose was 800 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was assessed every 3 months and defined as objective clinical response (RECIST) and disease-control rate (DCR), i.e. the percentage of patients who had a best-response ( complete response -CR or partial response- PR or stable disease- SD) maintained for at least 28 days. Results: From January to November 2008 14 patients (M/F ratio, 12:2; mean age 70.7 ±3.1 years; range, 66-76) were enrolled and 13 were evaluable after 3 months: 28.6% had ECOG PS 0, 57.1% PS 1, and 14.3% PS 2. According to MGA, 3 patients were fit, 8 intermediate and 3 frail. At 3-month evaluation no CR/PR, 8/13 (61.5%) SD, 5/13 (38.5%) PD were observed. DCR was 75.0% (6/8 patients). The toxicity was moderate and the worst was grade 3: hand-foot and skin reactions (30.7%), hypertension (15.4%), diarrhea (30.7%), nausea and vomiting (7.7%), asthenia (15.4%). The treatment was interrupted for a mean of 9 days (range 4-19) due to toxicities in 84.6% of patients and restarted at a reduced dosage (400 mg/day) which was well tolerated. The mean dosage was 552 mg/day. QoL improved globally and in particular for: pain, energy, physical activity and patient perception of self-health status. Serum IL-6 were high at enrolment and did not change thereafter. At Novembrer 2008, 10/13 patients are alive. Conclusion: In elderly cancer patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma sorafenib demonstrated a good DCR, a moderate toxicity at 800 mg/day, an optimal acceptability at 400 mg/day and a significant improvement of quality of life.
Back
|