Under-appreciated public health benefits of varicella vaccination

L.D. Notarangelo, R.F. Schumacher

Department of Pediatrics, University of Brescia, Italy

Varicella is generally perceived as a common and benign disease. While this is true for most cases of primary VZV infection in children, primary infection in adults (with a higher complication rate), reactivation in elderly people (leading to herpes Zoster), congenital varicella syndrome, disseminated neonatal varicella, and severe varicella in immunocompromised patients are a major concern. European data based on hospitalization rate, retrieval of sentinel system data, and centralized epidemiology reports, give somewhat different figures in different Countries for the incidence and complication rate following primary infection, indicating the need for a combined prospective approach. Local conditions, social factors, age, and seasonal shifts may all play a role in modifying varicella-related complications. Yet, altogether, European data indicate that severe complications of primary varicella infection are less frequent than reported in the US, where approximately 7,000-10,000 hospitalizations and 100 deaths occur each year for varicella. Importantly, annual hospitalization rate for Zoster are up to 4-fold higher than for primary varicella, with a high rate of severe and difficult-to-treat complications, such as post herpetic neuralgia. In considering the public health benefit of a VZV vaccine, different considerations must be taken into account. Prevention of Zoster, of varicella infection in pregnancy, and of primary infection in adults and in immunocompromised individuals are perhaps the most important public health benefits. Data from high-risk, immunocompromised patients, indicate that the VZV vaccine is effective in greatly (5-7 times) reducing the incidence and severity of Zoster. However, there is a need for continuous surveillance on the incidence of VZV-vaccine related Zoster, since the follow-up period for the first vaccinated cohorts are not yet long enough to cover the median latency time span of 30 years. Universal vaccination as a strategy to achieve all of the goals indicated above should be weighed against the risks associated with low vaccination coverage. In particular, coverage rates for recommended vaccines such as mumps-measles-rubella (MMR) are still low in many European Countries (Switzerland. 76%, Italy 50-60%, Germany 80%), with the consequence that measles-related deaths are still higher than for varicella, and that a shift has been observed towards primary infection in older groups of susceptible individuals (something that should be avoided for varicella). While it is important that higher coverage for MMR are reached in Europe before universal varicella vaccination be considered, strategies targeted at specific high-risk groups (including susceptible adults) warrant attention. Economically, a universal vaccination program (with more than 90% coverage) has been assessed by different studies on both sides of the Atlantic as cost-effective. However, this is true mostly when taking into account indirect costs (usually not at the expense of health care system), resulting from parental work loss, that add up to 71-82% of the total average cost for each pediatric case of primary varicella. Considering that 2-10% of vaccinees (the older the more) may develop a vaccine-associated rash with or without fever and malaise, that a proportion of vaccinees may develop breakthrough varicella, and that parents might or might not lose work-days and seek medical attention for this condition, a correct evaluation of the economical benefit of a universal vaccination programme is difficult, and requires specific studies.  A combined MMR-V vaccine would resolve most of these problems related to universal vaccination, provided that sufficient coverage is reached. Until then, vaccination strategies targeted to specific groups would be beneficial and should be implemented.