COMPARISION OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LATANOPROST WITH BRIMONIDINE IN PATIENTS WITH OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA AND OCULAR HYPERTENSION

H.M.T. Uusitalo and The Finnish, German, Irish, Spanish & UK Study Group

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tampere, Finland

The efficacy and safety of 0,005% latanoprost once daily was compared with 0,2% brimonidine twice daily in patients with unilateral or bilateral open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with an IOP >20 mmHg currently on monotherapy or dual therapy. Altohether 379 patients were enrolled in this 6-month, randomized, observed-masked multicenter study and subjected to appropriate washout period. The morning IOP (10 a.m.) was recorded 12 h after the administration of latanoprost and 2 h after brimonidine. The afternoon (5 p.m.) measurements were recorded 19 h after latanoprost and 9 h after brimonidine. The mean IOP reduction at 6 months was compared between the treatments. There were altogether 48 patients withdravals (5 in latanoprost and 43 in brimonidine group). The most common reason reasons were inadequately controlled IOP (2 vs 12) and ocular allergy (0 vs 14). After 6 month of treatment latanoprost reduced the mean IOP by 7.1 mmHg (28%) compared with 5,2 mmHg (21%)for brimonidine. This difference of 1,9 mmHg was statistically highly significant. (p<0,001, ANCOVA). A mean reduction of IOP > 30% was reached by 42% of latanoprost treated patients compared with 22% of brimonidine-treated patients.  Reduction of IOP less than 15% (non-responders) was recorded by 12% of latanoprost-treated patients and by 32% of brimonidine-treated patients. Systemic adverse events (p<0,001) and ocular allergy (p=0,005) were significantly more frequently reported in brimonidine treated patients.