GLAUCOMA IN EYES WITH EXFOLIATION SYNDROME

A.G.P. Konstas

Assistant Professor, University Department of Ophthalmology,

AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Glaucoma is significantly more common in eyes with exfoliation syndrome (XFS).  In normotensive persons with XFS, the risk of developing exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) is cumulative over time with the rate of conversion calculated to be approximately 1,5% per year.  Thus, the presence of XFS in an otherwise normal eye is an important risk factor for the development of glaucoma.  It has been estimated that in normal eyes XFS increases 10 times the risk for glaucoma.  Overall, XFS patients would have approximately a 40% chance of either having initially, or developing ocular hypertension or glaucoma within ten years.  However, a significant number of patients with XFS do not develop XFG in their lifetime.  It appears that the risk of XFG development (1,5% per year) in patients with XFS is at least similar to that of POAG in patients with ocular hypertension.  Therefore, long term monitoring of XFS patients is crucial in preventing visual loss from XFG.  Although most, if not all, patients with clinically visible unilateral XFS probably have bilateral disease, the asymmetry of involvement and progression of glaucoma in XFS is striking.   

Specific clinical attributes distinguish XFG from POAG.  There is uniform agreement that XFG has a more serious clinical course than POAG. There is a significantly higher frequency and severity of optic nerve damage at the time of diagnosis, worse visual field damage, poorer response to medications, more severe clinical course, and more frequent necessity for surgical intervention.  The more rapid progression of glaucomatous damage in XFG compared with POAG can probably be attributed to the worse IOP characteristics in XFG.  The mean diurnal IOP, the mean range of IOP and the mean maximum IOP are significantly greater in eyes with XFG.   The worse prognosis for XFG is shown by the fact that the probability for severe visual loss is two times greater compared with POAG.