|
|
PRELIMINARY SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM
Section: Clinical Development
|
Off Label Use: inevitable, essential or dangerous?
New drugs: not always as useful as they seem?
Developing End Points - Ocular Imaging |
| Ocular Imaging: The Next Generation |
Back To Section List |
Chairperson: S. Krupsky, Israel |
Location Versus Fovea Mapping Improvements
J. Cunha-Vaz, Portugal |
Next Generation Imaging Tools
S. Krupsky, Israel |
Multimodal Imaging - The Benefits and Promises of Integration
M.D. de Smet, The Netherlands |
Precision and Reproducibility in Spectral Domain OCT
J. Heier, USA |
| |
| Discussion: Off Label Use - Inevitable, Essential or Dangerous? |
Back To Section List |
| Chairperson: R. Vogel, USA |
Panel: A. Lowenstein, Israel, M. De Smet, The Netherlands,
D. Boyer, USA, R. Neumann, Israel |
Discussion topics: Avastin has reached world wide use for AMD without being approved by any agency for that indication - Should this have happened? Should this happen again?
Is Physician Directed Use morally defensible? Scientifically defensible? Are their any guiding principles that define the risk benefit assessment for the physician?
For a decade or more depot triamcinolone has been used inside and around the eye- was this risky? Are the risks of intravitreal steroid too high to justify its use? Is the availability of an approved non-preserved formulation a medical advance driven by Off label Use (aka -Physician Directed Use) - or an example of commercial exploitation? |
| |
| Discussion: New Drugs - Not Always as Useful as They Seem? |
Back To Section List |
Chairperson: R. Vogel, USA |
| Panel: H. Gabor, Hungary, I.S. Barequet, Israel, R.K. Brazzell, USA |
If a neuroprotective drug became available - would it become an essential part of glaucoma management?
If we had a drug to be used daily to prevent cataracts- would it be useful?
Current antibiotic use in ophthalmology-driven by irrational fear or scientifically justified? |
| |
|
|
|